It’s only natural for software startups to feel an overwhelming sense of confidence in the programs they develop, and this confidence can frequently have an impact on a startup’s commitment to engaging in thorough and frequent software testing. Of course, this does not mean that these startups are overlooking software testing altogether, but it is fair to suggest that far too many are underestimating the potential benefits associated with a thorough testing process and the inherent drawbacks associated with a lack thereof.

Startups already utilizing Agile development principles are certainly likely to understand that software testing should be an ongoing process that is accomplished with a great deal of efficiency yet still involves all levels of the company. To accomplish this, startups who have agile software testing processes typically use JIRA to track, manage and report on bugs/issues that are found during the testing process. Using JIRA alongside a JIRA test management add-on, teams gain increased traceability and visibility into requirements and defects which allows teams to plan, track, test and work smarter and faster than ever before. This agility and speed is critical to the fast and nimble world of technology startups.

The potentially negative consequences associated with a relative lack of commitment to software testing are well documented, which should only serve to underscore the importance of engaging in thorough and frequent testing practices. The 2013 launch of the federal healthcare exchange website is perhaps the most obvious example of the negative impact associated with inadequate software testing, as it not only tripled the original overall cost of building the exchange website, but it also served as a poor first impression that continues to play a role in shaping the public’s perception of the entire initiative.

Most startups are not likely to have the financial wherewithal to overcome such a catastrophe, and it’s even less likely that any startup could undo the damage done to their reputation stemming from such a massive software failure. While it should be obvious to any startup that it is preferable to avoid any potentially negative consequences by engaging in an appropriate level of software testing, there are a number of improvements that can be made to software through the implementation of a detailed and ongoing testing process.

As programming homework experts are saying, development teams using a purpose-built test management platform are simply more likely to identify any issues quickly and easily, enabling a greater focus on the actual design and development of the software. Neither the quality of the software nor the range of functionalities it offers must be sacrificed in order to deliver the product in the relatively brief timeframe that is often demanded. This process is made even easier through the use of highly effective software testing management tools specifically designed for use with Agile, with the qTest platform made available by QASymphony representing an ideal example.

It’s fairly evident that tech startups recognize that software testing is a necessary part of the preparation that goes into every product launch. The issue is not merely recognizing testing as a necessary component; it is ensuring that tech startups recognize the value associated with a comprehensive approach to testing that does not require the sacrifice of developmental efficiency and thus enables adherence to any previously established product release dates. After all, what startup would not want to ensure the on-time release of an issue-free product of exceptional quality that also includes a full range of functionalities?It’s fairly evident that tech startups recognize that software testing is a necessary part of the preparation that goes into every product launch.

The issue is not merely recognizing testing as a necessary component; it is ensuring that tech startups recognize the value associated with a comprehensive approach to testing that does not require the sacrifice of developmental efficiency and thus enables adherence to any previously established product release dates. After all, what startup would not want to ensure the on-time release of an issue-free product of exceptional quality that also includes a full range of functionalities?